[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/11/29]
On Saturday 29 November 2003 15:17, Gabor Szabo wrote: > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Richard Clamp wrote: > > Oh, actually on further checking, that's not really how svn does it at > > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/ - they just have a /trunk and drop > > everything in there. What I'm describing is more how Siesta does it, > > so nevermind. > > Checking out the link you gave I think what you do in Siesta is very > similar, but probably clearer than what they do. > > In the book the > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/html-chunk/ch04s07.html > they mention both ways and I still think if I want to allow > others to have commit right to part of the tree - a sister > project - then it is better to do it from the root so they can have their > own trunk/branch/tags. > > Luckily as I learn more about Subversion I see rearranging directories and > files is very easy so even if later we see that the current layout is > not good we can *easily* change it. > That's one of the things I like the most about Subversion. It actually feels like a real file-system (only versioned). Whenever I'm using CVS, I always think a lot on how to name a file or where to place it, because I know I cannot move or copy it later. In Subversion, this is entirely a non-issue. That's why I find using CVS more and more frustrating. Subversion ownz! Regards, Shlomi Fish -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish shlomif@xxxx.xxx.xx Homepage: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/ I don't believe in fairies. Oops! A fairy died. I don't believe in fairies. Oops! Another fairy died.
Generated at 18:00 on 29 Nov 2003 by mariachi 0.51