[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/11/24]
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > strange as I think it does not need with my Apache bt I might have missed > > something I already configured. > > > > Well, it does not work without it on my workstation here. so note that in the readme > I suggest we keep the main pages of the site at the root directory, while > using the img and/or files sub-directory for files. All this discussion is > void if every path can be configurable. sure, so come up with a script that does not need any change in a default apache configuration and we'll see. Remember, not everyone will be able to change the Apache configuration. Heck this script is supposed to work on IIS too. GaborThere's stuff above here
Generated at 20:06 on 24 Nov 2003 by mariachi 0.51